Abstract Archive

Below you can download and view abstracts that have been presented and discussed at various society meetings. Abstracts are presented in PDF format.

coflex® Interlaminar Implant Abstracts

Comparative Clinico-Radiological Study of Interlaminar Decompression in Lumbar Canal Stenosis with and without coflex® Interspinous Spacer; Prospective Observational Study.pdf

Kumar N, Ng YH, Tan BWL

 

Selective Decompression and Interlaminar Dynamic Stabilization for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis Clinical Application and Complications.pdf

Hai Y, Lu S, Zang L

 

Dynamic stabilization in lumbar spinal stenosis with coflex® interspineous implant - an update.pdf

Bertagnoli R

 

coflex® Interlaminar Stabilization Compared to Posterior Spinal Fusion for Spinal Stenosis and Spondylolisthesis 2 Year Results from the Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter FDA IDE Trial.pdf

Davis RJ, Errico TJ, Bae H, Auerbach JD

 

Direct Neurologic Decompression Improves Functional Neurologic Outcomes in Spinal Stenosis and Low-grade Spondylolisthesis A Comparison of coflex® Interlaminar Stabilization, Laminectomy_Spinal Fusion, a. XSTOP.pdf

Auerbach JD, Lauryssen C, Davis RJ

Comparative Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Coflex Interlaminar Stabilization versus Posterolateral Fusion for Lumbar Stenosis and Low-grade Spondylolisthesis.pdf

Auerbach JD, Zigler JD, Davis RJ, Pettine K, Yeung A

 

Low-grade Spondylolisthesis Can Be Effectively Treated by Either coflex® Interlaminar Stabilization or Laminectomy and Posterior Spinal Fusion Two-year Clinical and Radiographic Results from the US IDE Trial.pdf

Davis RJ, Auerbach JD, Bae H, Errico TJ

 

Mitigation of Investigator Bias in Adverse Event Reporting from an Industry-sponsored Spine Surgery Study Utilization of an Independent Clinical Events Committee.pdf

Auerbach JD, McGowan K, Halevi M, Maislin G

 

Perioperative Outcomes, Complications, and Costs Associated with Lumbar Spinal Fusion in Older Patients with Spinal Stenosis and Spondylolisthesis Analysis of the United States Medicare Claims Database.pdf

Auerbach JD, Ong KL, Lau E, Ochoa J, Schmier J, Zigler JD

 

A Comparison of Short Form-12 Health-Related Quality of Life Improvements following coflex® Interlaminar Stabilization, Lumbar Spinal Fusion with and without Cages, and Total Joint Arthroplasty.pdf

Auerbach JD, Sears WR

 

Functional Dynamic Stabilization in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with coflex® Interspineous Implant - 4 Year Results.pdf

Bertagnoli R

 

coflex-F® Interlaminar Implant Abstracts

Radiographic Evaluation of a Novel Interspinous_Interlaminar Fusion Implant (coflex-F®)System to Augment Lumbar Interbody Fusion.pdf

Afshar H, Eif M, Schenke H, Auerbach JD

 

The coflex F® - A New Minimally Invasive Device for the PLIF Procedure.pdf

Eif M

 

DCI™ Dynamic Cervical Implant Abstracts 

Does maintenance of physiologic kinematics in the adjacent prevent adjacent segment degeneration following dynamic cervical stabilization.pdf NEW

Herdmann J, Buddenberg P, Trautwein F, Rhee S, Pilz A, Floeth F

 

Dynamic Cervical Implant. Alternative between Cage Fusion and Total Disc Replacement.pdf

Matge G

 

Biomechanical Investigation of a Cervical Dynamical Stabilization Device in Comparison to Fusion and TDR.pdf

Daentzer D, Hurschler C, Schwarze M, Packheiser A, Tak S, Richter B, Welke B

 

Physical and Mental Life Quality in Patients Treated with Dynamic Cervical Implant.pdf

Herdmann J, Zillner B, Buddenberg P, Floeth F

 

Biomechanical Comparison between Fusion, TDR and Dynamic Stabilization.pdf

Welke B, Hurschler C, Schwarze M, Packheiser A, Tak S, Richter B, Daentzer D

 

Life quality after cervical reconstruction with dynamic cervical Implant.pdf

Herdmann J, Buddenberg P, Pilz A, Rhee S, Floeth F

 

Dynamic Cervical Stabilization A Novel, Motion-preserving Alternative to Fusion and Articulating Total Disc Replacement.pdf

Auerbach JD, Rundell SA

 

Biomechanical Concept of a Novel Dynamic Cervical Implant.pdf

Welke B, Hurschler C, Packheiser A, Richter B, Daentzer D

 

Can dynamic cervical disc replacement compete with to ACDF.pdf

Herdmann J, Buddenberg P, Pilz A, Rhee S, Floeth F

 

DSS® Dynamic Stabilization System Abstracts 

Pedicle Based Posterior Dynamic Stabilization System (DSS®).pdf

Bertagnoli R

 

Semi-rigid Lumbar Spinal Stabilization Lowers Screw-bone Interface Force and Cancellous Bone Strain when Compared with PEEK and Titanium Rod Systems in a Healthy and Osteoporotic Spine.pdf

Auerbach JD, Hanulewicz P, Rundell SA

 

Patient Satisfaction Following Lumbar DSS® Surgery (Dynamic Spine Stabilization System, Paradigm Spine).pdf

Selvan D, El Malky M, Cadman S, Shackleford I

 

Functional Pedicle Based Posterior Dynamic Stabilization System (DSS®) - First Results.pdf

Bertagnoli R

 

HPS™ Hybrid Performance System Abstracts

Biomechanical investigation of dynamic topping-off in two-level posterior instrumentation.pdf  NEW

Schmoelz W, Keiler A, Hartmann S, Scheufler K-M, Thomé C, Hegewald A A

Disclaimer: Information regarding the use of products outside the United States is provided for educational purposes only, and does not represent promotion, claims, or intended use outside approved U.S. labeling.